Why Programmatic Advertising is being rebuilt from the ground up

As open exchange CPMs erode and artificial inventory bleeds advertisers dry, a sharper, smarter and more accountable era of digital advertising is taking shape

e4m by Anuja Jain
Published: May 25, 2026 9:14 AM  | 8 min read
Programmatic
  • e4m Twitter
  • The Indian digital advertising industry is undergoing a significant transformation as stakeholders question the effectiveness of programmatic advertising, which has historically prioritized scale and low costs over quality and measurable outcomes.
  • Open web display CPMs on programmatic exchanges have dropped by 20-30% since 2021, highlighting concerns about the prevalence of low-quality "Made-For-Advertising" (MFA) sites that generate ad revenue without genuine audience engagement.
  • Advertisers are increasingly demanding greater accountability and transparency, shifting focus from cheap reach to cost-per-outcome metrics, and adopting strategies like Supply-Path Optimization (SPO) to ensure ad spend reaches quality environments.
  • The integration of artificial intelligence is expected to reshape the programmatic landscape by enabling predictive capabilities that enhance targeting and improve advertising effectiveness, presenting a unique opportunity for India's market to establish a more accountable and quality-driven advertising ecosystem.

There is a quiet reckoning underway in the corridors of India's digital advertising industry. For over a decade, programmatic advertising (the automated buying and selling of digital ad space in real time) promised marketers a utopia of scale, speed and efficiency. It served ads that reached millions of consumers with surgical precision, at fractions of a rupee per impression. The system worked, at least on paper. Dashboards looked clean, campaigns delivered at scale and CPMs (cost per thousand impressions, the basic currency of digital advertising) stayed competitive. What nobody was measuring, it turned out, was whether any of it actually worked.

That question is now being asked loudly and urgently. Open web display CPMs on programmatic exchanges have fallen 20 to 30 percent since 2021, according to industry reports. In 2023, Made-For-Advertising sites, known in the industry as MFAs, cost global advertisers an estimated 13 billion dollars. These are low-quality web pages built almost entirely to harvest ad dollars, with no genuine editorial value and no real audiences. And yet the ecosystem kept running, because the machinery was designed to reward volume, not value. What is changing now is that brands, procurement teams and platform builders are collectively deciding that cheap reach is no longer the same as smart spending. The industry is, slowly but unmistakably, growing up.

This shift is not merely cosmetic. It represents a structural reimagination of how digital advertising should function. The direction of travel is away from open auctions that flood the market with low-quality supply and toward curated, intelligence-driven environments where inventory quality, audience intent and measurable business outcomes are non-negotiable. As artificial intelligence reshapes the mechanics of buying and selling, the window for building this new architecture is narrower than it appears.

The Structural Crack Beneath the Surface

To understand why the industry finds itself here, it is important to understand how programmatic advertising actually works. When a user visits a webpage, an automated auction takes place in milliseconds. Advertisers, through platforms called Demand-Side Platforms (DSPs), bid to show that user an ad. Publishers make their inventory available through Supply-Side Platforms (SSPs). The highest bidder wins the impression. The whole process happens faster than a blink.

For years, this system prioritised two things above everything else: scale and low cost. The more impressions available, the lower the price. The lower the price, the more efficiently a campaign could be run, or so the logic went. The problem is that this race to the bottom was not a pricing anomaly. It was the system working exactly as designed, and it rewarded the wrong behaviour.

The consequences were predictable in hindsight. Premium publishers found themselves competing in the same auction pool as low-value inventory farms. Advertisers paid for impressions on pages no real reader visited with genuine interest. And the MFA ecosystem, websites manufactured purely to generate ad revenue with no real editorial purpose, thrived precisely because it passed every automated quality check with low CPMs, high viewability scores and strong completion rates. The metrics looked fine. The results were not.

"When your measurement framework optimises for proxies of attention rather than actual business impact, bad inventory becomes invisible by design," says Tejas Rathod, Founder and CTO of Mobavenue AI Tech Limited. The intelligence layer, he argues, had simply not caught up to the transaction layer. Until now.

Says Akash Sharma, Chief Strategy Officer at Admerly, "The market collectively rewarded reach over relevance."

"DSPs optimised toward cheaper outcomes, SSPs expanded supply aggressively, and brands often prioritised short-term efficiency metrics over long-term media quality," he explained.

 

The Quality Correction Is Here, and It Is Real

The shift that practitioners describe is not a sudden revolution. It is a slow, structural correction that is part genuine reform and part rebranding, and the difference between the two matters enormously to anyone allocating serious media budgets. What is genuine is that advertisers have grown materially more rigorous. Three years ago, conversations between brands and agencies were largely limited to viewability rates and brand safety metrics. Today, sophisticated clients are requesting log-level data breakdowns, domain-level attribution and full supply-path documentation as standard practice.

"Three years ago we'd occasionally be asked about viewability and brand safety. Today sophisticated clients are asking for log-level breakdowns, domain-level performance data and supply path documentation as standard," says Venkat Gavaskar Dontha, Head of Digital Operations at NP Digital India.

This growing accountability is also reshaping the internal dynamics of organisations. Procurement teams, historically removed from media decisions, are now actively influencing how advertising budgets are deployed. Marketing and procurement functions are increasingly being asked to align not around the lowest CPM but around cost-per-outcome, a fundamentally different and more demanding benchmark. Sharma notes that this is creating healthier pressure across the ecosystem, with advertisers seeking clearer visibility into where budgets actually flow and which intermediaries genuinely add value to the chain.

The emergence of curated marketplaces and Supply-Path Optimisation strategies, known as SPO, reflects this shift in thinking. SPO, in simple terms, is the practice of deliberately choosing which intermediaries and exchanges are involved in a transaction, cutting out unnecessary middlemen and ensuring that ad spend reaches quality environments. For publishers with genuine audience depth and editorial credibility, this creates a meaningful opportunity to command better pricing. For those who built their business model purely on open exchange volume, it is an existential challenge.

"Publishers who treat the open exchange as a primary revenue channel rather than a residual one are in a difficult position," Dontha observes. The ones navigating this well, he adds, have moved decisively into first-party data infrastructure, private marketplace deals and direct buyer relationships where audience quality can be demonstrated, not just claimed.

Artificial Intelligence and the Intelligence Era of Advertising

If the first phase of this correction has been about cleaning up the supply chain, the next phase will be driven by artificial intelligence, and its implications are far more radical than most practitioners currently appreciate.

Programmatic advertising, for all its automation, has historically been a transaction infrastructure business. Its competitive advantages were speed, scale and the ability to process enormous volumes of bids simultaneously. Artificial intelligence is now dismantling that as a source of differentiation. What AI enables is something qualitatively different, namely the ability to predict the outcome of an impression before the bid is placed, using behavioural signals, contextual cues and conversion probability modelling. The auction is being commoditised. The intelligence behind it is where value will accumulate.

This becomes particularly consequential as the industry confronts the accelerating erosion of third-party cookies, the tracking mechanisms that have historically powered audience targeting. As deterministic identity signals become harder to scale, predictive AI models built on first-party data and contextual intelligence will become the primary targeting currency.

"AI is fundamentally reshaping programmatic from a transaction infrastructure business into an intelligence business," says Sharma. "Competitive advantage will come from predicting attention, outcomes, contextual relevance, and supply quality before a bid is even placed."

The implications for leverage within the ecosystem are significant. Buyers who invest now in first-party data infrastructure and conversion prediction capabilities that do not depend on third-party identifiers will be disproportionately advantaged. On the supply side, publishers with genuine audience depth are in a structurally better position than the open exchange era suggested, but only if they build the data infrastructure to make that advantage legible to AI-powered buying systems. "Most publishers haven't yet built the data infrastructure to monetise that advantage through AI-powered channels," Dontha cautions.

Rathod frames it in starker terms. "The bid is being commoditised. What matters now is the intelligence behind it." Mobavenue's decisioning engine, he notes, processes signals across devices and touchpoints with real-time inference at under 15 milliseconds, optimising not for the next bid but for the downstream business outcome. It is a technical illustration of a strategic principle: the companies that will define the next era of programmatic are those that own the intelligence layer end-to-end.

India's Moment to Build It Right

There is a dimension to this story that is specific to India and worth paying close attention to. Unlike Western markets, where an entire ecosystem of bad habits accumulated over a decade and is now being painfully unwound, India's programmatic infrastructure is still being formed. Buying practices are maturing. Supply chains are not yet locked into legacy patterns. This creates a rare and time-limited opportunity.

"There's a real opportunity to skip the bad habits that took Western markets a decade to unlearn," Dontha says, "if brands and agencies are willing to build with quality as a first principle rather than retrofitting it later."

That is the choice now facing every brand manager, agency head and publisher operating in this market. The tools for smarter, more accountable advertising have arrived. The frameworks for measuring genuine outcomes rather than proxy metrics are being built and deployed. The question is not whether the programmatic industry will evolve. It already is. The question is whether India's digital advertising community will lead that evolution or learn from it after the fact.

The era of cheap reach as a proxy for smart advertising is ending. What replaces it will be more demanding, more transparent and, if built correctly, considerably more effective. For an industry that has spent a decade chasing scale, that is not a threat. It is an overdue opportunity.

 

Published On: May 25, 2026 9:14 AM