We are appealing Delhi HC order, says Google in Hindware trademark case
The tech giant has said that the ruling departs from established legal precedent in India as it challenges the Delhi High Court verdict on trademark keyword bidding
by
Published: Jul 9, 2026 6:21 PM | 2 min read
- Google is appealing a Delhi High Court ruling in a trademark dispute with Hindware, claiming the decision deviates from established legal precedents regarding keyword advertising in India.
- The case revolves around the legality of competitors bidding on the "Hindware" trademark in Google Ads without displaying the trademark in the ad text.
- Google argues that bidding on trademarked keywords is a common practice that fosters competition and consumer choice, asserting that such use does not constitute trademark infringement unless it causes consumer confusion.
- The company has complied with court-ordered blocking measures while maintaining its advertising policies and is awaiting further judicial review.
Google has moved to challenge the Delhi High Court's recent ruling in the trademark dispute involving Hindware, arguing that the judgment departs from established legal precedent governing keyword advertising in India.
"We are appealing the Delhi High Court's order, which diverges from established legal precedents in India. Our ads policies reflect standard practices that enable competition and give consumers more choices. We look forward to presenting our position to the court," a Google spokesperson said.
Read earlier e4m report on ‘Who owns search?’
The appeal follows the Delhi High Court's decision in the long running dispute over the use of trademarked terms as advertising keywords. The case centred on whether competitors could bid on the "Hindware" trademark in Google Ads, even when the trademark did not appear in the visible text of an advertisement.
Google has maintained that allowing advertisers to bid on trademarked keywords is a globally accepted practice designed to promote competition and offer consumers alternative choices. The company argues that the backend use of a trademark as a keyword, by itself, does not amount to trademark infringement unless the resulting advertisement creates consumer confusion, deception or trademark dilution.
Read - From rented intent to owned demand
The company also points to previous Indian judicial precedents, including matters involving MakeMyTrip and DRS Logistics, where courts held that internet users are capable of distinguishing between competing advertisements and are not automatically misled merely because an alternative appears in search results.
Google's advertising policies continue to prohibit advertisers from using another company's trademark in the visible text of an advertisement where it could mislead consumers. Trademark owners can also file complaints against misleading advertisements, which are reviewed under the company's existing ad policies.
While pursuing the appeal, Google said it has complied with the specific blocking measures directed under the ongoing legal proceedings without affecting other advertisers' campaigns. The company added that its advertising policies remain unchanged as it awaits further judicial consideration of the matter.
Read more news about Digital Media, Internet Advertising, Marketing News, Television Media, Radio Media
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube & Google News
