Rising e-commerce cost: Are small & regional advertisers taking the hardest hit?

A few days ago, we examined how India’s new GST rules and labour reforms are quietly forcing e-commerce and quick-commerce platforms to rethink some of their most fundamental growth levers. The era of blanket discounts, ₹0 delivery and ultra-fast fulfilment subsidised at any cost is fading, giving way to conditional incentives, subscription-led loyalty, higher basket thresholds and profitability-first logistics models.

And if that was the first structural reset, the next ripple is now beginning to surface — small and regional advertisers are bearing the heaviest strain of India’s rising e-commerce costs and regulatory realignments.

While marketplaces and large national brands have the balance sheets to weather this transition, smaller and regional brands are taking a double hit. Multiple marketers confirmed to e4m that the squeeze is real, and across several categories, regional players are losing visibility, in some cases even getting displaced outright by aggressive national advertisers.

Agreeing to this, Shradha Agarwal, Co-Founder and CEO of Grapes Worldwide, stated, “Yes, smaller and regional advertisers are feeling the squeeze. As delivery costs, GST, and platform commissions rise, their ability to bid aggressively has dropped. Many have cut back on marketplace ads and performance spends because the unit economics no longer support constant bidding wars. And honestly, the platforms take insane 15–30% cuts. They are the only ones making money.”

As platform commissions, delivery-linked fees and compliance costs climb, the economics of staying visible on digital marketplaces is rapidly being rewritten. For small and regional advertisers, the math simply doesn’t stretch the same way anymore.

Also read: New tax & labour rules: What rising compliance costs mean for e-comm platforms

E-commerce players ramp up ad spends in FY25

Ads fuel one-third of eComm giants’ earnings

Why Small & Regional Advertisers Are Losing The Marketplace Battle

Over the last 12 months, delivery-linked commissions and GST on logistics have made visibility on marketplaces disproportionately expensive, and regional advertisers are the first to fall through the cracks. One of the reasons is that the cost of staying discoverable, not just selling, has gone up sharply. Bigger brands have countered this shift with deeper pockets, for smaller brands, however, the rules of the game have changed faster than their media wallets. Marketplace bidding has become a high-stakes arena, with national brands outspending everyone to dominate top slots during sale days, payday weekends and seasonal peaks.

Because of this pressure of not matching without burning margins, many small advertisers have cut back on marketplace ads because the unit economics no longer support constant bidding wars.

Once smaller brands reduce spend, the visibility penalty is immediate and brutal, they drop from search results, get buried under sponsored listings and lose algorithmic momentum, making even organic discovery harder. Demand hasn’t slowed; purchase discovery has simply become pay-to-play.

This shift has forced tighter prioritisation rather than complete withdrawal. As Chetan Asher, Founder & CEO, Tonic Worldwide, pointed out “They’re tightening, not exiting. Smaller brands are now focussing their budgets on top SKUs, peak moments and proven audience pools. The auction has become too competitive, so the expectation now is payback within weeks, not an always-on footprint.”

Binu Balan, Founder and Director of Reel Tribe, who works with regional brands navigating the new economics of digital visibility, added that an often-underestimated factor behind this squeeze is that digital visibility itself has become structurally more expensive, far beyond the rise in compliance or platform costs. “Digital visibility has become expensive. The cost of making content that actually works, culturally relevant, conversion aligned, analytically optimised, has gone up. So, the brand pays more to create the content and then pays more to promote it. If performance doesn’t follow, the only winner in the cycle is the platform.”

He added that big advertisers can afford high-frequency, high-variety content that feeds platform algorithms, multiple creatives, sharp segmentation, funnel-based optimisation and independent measurement. Smaller advertisers, on the other hand, are often forced into low-cost production where critical steps like research, landing-page optimisation and attribution get skipped. The content goes out, the budget gets spent, but conversions don’t follow, not because demand doesn’t exist, but because the execution threshold required to win today has moved beyond what small advertisers can sustain.

Speaking about patterns across rural and Tier-II/Tier-III markets, Sarabjit Singh Puri of Fateh Rural, a rural marketing and advertising agency, noted that for many regional brands the problem isn’t demand, it’s that the cost of staying visible is now eating into the cost of selling. Marketers add that this recalibration has triggered a spike in enquiries from small and regional brands, not because they suddenly have larger budgets, but because they are actively looking for alternatives that don’t require bidding wars simply to remain discoverable.

At the same time, there is a counter-view, Rajesh Radhakrishnan, Founder Director and Chief Marketing Officer, Vritti iMedia, rural activation agencies in India, acknowledges that discoverability was the first casualty as national brands escalated spending during high-traffic events, but maintains that small advertisers who sharpen segmentation and optimise campaigns can still extract strong ROI from platforms.

However, this squeeze isn’t uniform across the country. In Kerala, the picture looks more balanced. Devika M S, Director of Operations at Mathrubhumi, explains that GST-linked changes haven’t reduced e-commerce volumes or significantly altered regional brand spending patterns. In fact, a downward price revision in vernacular dailies has made them more attractive, reinforcing their position as a preferred medium for local communication.

Over the last year, most regional advertisers in Kerala have maintained budgets similar to previous years, but with a different pressure point, customer acquisition on digital platforms has become expensive, making it difficult for newer brands to rely solely on performance marketing to build a direct-to-consumer model. This has renewed interest in trusted and cost-effective regional media, she added.

Overall, Kerala’s experience shows that the landscape is being reshaped not by GST alone but by a combination of rising acquisition costs, the need for stronger brand presence, and the cultural power of local language. 

Boby Paul, Senior General Manager - Marketing, Malayala Manorama Online Digital echoed this, noting that there is no exceptional surge from regional brands — rather, steady demand as brands reassess strategy, not cut budgets.

From Marketplace Bidding To Micro Funnels

The problem, several experts agree, is not ecommerce itself, it is over-dependence on marketplaces as the only engine of discovery and demand generation. Small brands are not exiting online; they are being pushed to rediscover smarter, more diversified paths to growth because buying their way to the top of search results is no longer economically sustainable.

As marketplace bidding gets prohibitively competitive, budgets are being redistributed rather than withdrawn. A clear pattern has emerged: performance budgets are no longer synonymous with marketplace ads. Instead, discovery and storytelling are being rebuilt in environments where cost per impression is lower, cultural relevance is higher, and engagement is more organic.

Marketers say that micro-influencers, regional short-form video platforms, hyperlocal community pages and neighbourhood-focussed digital formats are absorbing a noticeable share of marketplace budgets, not because they replace the trust and conversion infrastructure of marketplaces, but because they keep the top of the funnel fuelled without draining margins.

Agarwal confirms this trend, explaining that the shift is not category-led but platform- and spend-led. Smaller advertisers are quietly moving toward channels that offer more control at lower cost, from vernacular and micro influencers to regional content platforms, and even print and outdoor when the objective is hyperlocal discovery. 

Asher also noted that brands are reallocating precisely where conversion efficiency is strongest, not chasing the next shiny channel. Regional creators, community commerce formats and vernacular content, once considered tactical, are now being treated as core discovery infrastructure.

Adding another dimension to this, Balan added that the shift is not just about cost, it is also about accountability. Visibility on marketplaces has become expensive, but what makes the situation worse for small advertisers is that they operate inside closed ecosystems where the platform displays the ad, measures the performance and reports the results. Without independent verification of impressions, clicks or attribution, smaller brands have no neutral source to validate performance when conversions remain low. 

Industry watchers agree that the small advertisers who are holding their ground are the ones who have stopped thinking of digital as a monolith.

After speaking with multiple experts, one thing is clear that the pressure on small and regional advertisers is not just a fallout of higher GST, delivery commissions or compliance costs. The real story is the cumulative burden of a digital ecosystem where discoverability, relevance and measurability have become premium commodities. In today’s market, simply being seen, and being seen by the right consumer, costs more than ever before.