Startup team orders Rs 2.9 lakh graphics card online, receives detergent

The buyer also pointed out discrepancies in the package, alleging that the manufacturer’s seals had been cut and re-taped, and that a suspicious barcode label had been affixed to the box

e4m by Vaishnavi Deshpande
Published: Mar 24, 2026 6:50 PM  | 5 min read
Graphics Card x Detergent
  • e4m Twitter

In a bizarre online shopping incident that has quickly gone viral, a man claimed he received a packet of detergent instead of a high-end graphics card worth Rs 2.9 lakh. The case, which surfaced through a post on X and Reddit, has sparked widespread discussion around delivery lapses and online shopping risks.

He shared an unboxing video online as evidence on X and Reddit and raised concerns about how such a discrepancy could pass through warehouse checks.

The Order and the Delivery

According to the buyer, he had ordered a GIGABYTE RTX 5090 graphics card. The order was placed through Amazon’s Fulfilled by Amazon (FBA) programme, which means the product was supposed to be stored, packed, and shipped directly from an Amazon warehouse, a service generally considered more reliable and safer than third-party shipping.

The package was delivered and, on the surface, the outer Amazon shipping bag appeared to be sealed. The internal box was far from intact. It had sliced manufacturer seals that were poorly re-taped and a fake aftermarket barcode, suggesting the package may have been tampered with before it even reached the customer. Inside the GPU box, there was no graphics card, just bubble wrap and a 1 kg packet of laundry detergent.

Red Flags Everywhere

The buyers quickly flagged something else that supported their case: the weight printed on the shipping label. The shipping label listed the parcel’s weight as just 1.56 kg. A real RTX 5090 graphics card with its retail packaging typically weighs between 2.5 to 3 kg.

The invoice raised additional concerns too, showing 0% IGST on a Rs 2.9 lakh electronics purchase, which is legally incorrect since such transactions in India attract 18% GST.

This was not an isolated incident, and the pattern was visible in plain sight on the product page itself.

A user highlighted how the price of the card should have been a warning sign from the start. The typical market rate for an RTX 5090 in India is around Rs 4 lakh, but this listing had it for significantly less at Rs 2.9 lakh.

There was another case where a user received a sugar packet after ordered GPU 5090 for 2.68 lakhs.

Amazon’s Response

Despite submitting the unboxing video, photographs, and invoice details as evidence, the buyers hit a wall. Amazon’s Executive Customer Relations team, after initially promising a resolution, sent an email stating that the “correct product was shipped” and refused the refund.

What the Internet Had to Say

The story spread quickly across X and Reddit, drawing hundreds of reactions from users who were equal parts outraged and unsurprised. Some shared their own similar experiences, while others questioned the authenticity of the unboxing footage.

One user wrote: “A similar thing happened to me 2 years ago when I ordered a pair of Nike shoes of 3.7k and received a non-branded shoes, I instantly applied for a refund and still haven’t received it.”

https://x.com/Divyans52405196/status/2035801421724144101?s=20

Another was more sceptical: “I checked your video, it looks super edited, I demand to see the original video.”

A third user chimed in with their own experience: “Had a very similar experience when I bought my GoPro 12. The seller had actually disabled the return option, and when the package arrived, the box was already partially opened. To my shock, the original GoPro had been swapped out for a cheap camera.”

A fourth had practical advice: “I am not saying u r wrong but a Rs.2.9L item and you didn't even manage to record the unboxing properly. Never do that again.”

The incident has once again brought attention to concerns around packaging integrity, seller accountability and delivery checks. As online shopping continues to grow, such instances often prompt conversations around trust, verification and consumer safeguards.

 

(Note: The authenticity of the claims made in the original post has not been independently verified.)

Published On: Mar 24, 2026 6:50 PM