Reckoning of Trust: How BFSI marketers are navigating changing digital metrics
With BFSI marketing facing the challenge of longer customer acquisition & consumer doubt, the increasing emphasis is on trust scores, grievance resolution & brands building confidence-led journeys
by
Published: May 20, 2026 8:43 AM | 8 min read
- The Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI) sector in India is facing a dual challenge of declining consumer trust and reduced organic visibility due to changes in digital marketing dynamics, particularly with the rise of AI-generated content and performance marketing metrics.
- As a result, financial brands are shifting their focus from traditional metrics like click-through rates to "trust metrics," which include Net Promoter Scores, customer retention rates, and grievance resolution ratios, reflecting a deeper understanding of customer relationships.
- The industry's emphasis is moving from rapid customer acquisition to fostering long-term confidence and trust, recognizing that a customer’s willingness to stay and engage is more valuable than mere transaction counts.
- To adapt, BFSI brands are redesigning digital engagement strategies to prioritize customer experience and trust-building at every interaction, shifting from acquisition-first campaigns to confidence-led journeys that enhance customer retention and satisfaction.
In financial services, there has always been an unwritten contract between a brand and its customer. The brand promises safety, clarity, and reliability. The customer, in return, offers something far more valuable than a click, they offer their confidence. For the better part of the last decade, that contract was quietly rewritten by the logic of performance marketing, where the click became the currency and the install became the proof of success. The industry optimised aggressively, and it worked, until it didn't.
Today, India's Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance sector is confronting the consequences of that trade-off from two directions simultaneously. Consumer scepticism is no longer background noise; it is a structural force reshaping how financial brands are built, measured, and sustained. And now, the very digital infrastructure that BFSI marketers built their acquisition funnels on is being disrupted from above. Google's expanding deployment of AI Overviews — AI-generated summaries that sit at the top of search results and answer user queries directly is compressing the research journey that once drove organic traffic to banks, insurers, and fintechs. The combined pressure of eroding consumer trust and shrinking organic visibility is forcing the sector into a reckoning it can no longer defer.
The most significant shift is not in messaging or creative strategy. It is in measurement. A new category of metrics, trust metrics, is emerging inside financial marketing functions, sitting alongside and in many cases replacing the click-through rates and cost-per-install numbers that once defined campaign success. Net Promoter Score, complaint resolution ratios, customer retention rates, app uninstall data, multi-product holding, and advisory engagement time are finding their way into marketing dashboards and, increasingly, into the presentations that CMOs make to their boards. The question being asked is no longer just how many customers a brand acquired. It is whether those customers stayed, whether they understood what they bought, and whether they would come back.
To understand why trust has become a boardroom priority, it helps to first understand what is happening to the economics of digital acquisition in BFSI. According to the dentsu-e4m Report 2026, BFSI contributed Rs 2,315 crore to India's digital advertising spends in 2025, with approximately 30 per cent of the category's digital budget allocated to paid search alone. That is a significant concentration of investment in a channel that is now under structural pressure. Industry estimates suggest that search and performance marketing costs for BFSI advertisers in India have risen by 20 to 30 per cent year on year, with overall digital customer acquisition costs climbing 25 to 40 per cent as brands compensate for declining organic reach.
The Reputational Cost of Instant Everything
The "instant" era of BFSI marketing: instant loans, instant approvals, instant returns, delivered genuine scale. It also delivered a reputational correction that is now playing out in real time. Brands that built their entire consumer proposition around speed and frictionless access are finding that speed, without transparency, creates a specific kind of customer: one who downloaded an app in thirty seconds and deleted it in thirty days.
Noel Mascarenhas, Head of Marketing at Aadhar Housing Finance, describes the shift with a precision that reflects how the conversation has changed internally at many BFSI firms. "There is definitely a reputational correction occurring across parts of the BFSI industry, particularly for brands which heavily depended on instant gratification messaging," he says. "Even though speed and convenience are considered important, consumers nowadays are becoming far more cautious of the risks associated with misleading promises, hidden terms, and aggressive digital lending journeys." The signals, he notes, are already visible through stricter regulatory rules, increased scrutiny of online lending, rising consumer complaints, and a clear preference among consumers for clarity over urgency. "In finance, trust cannot be compressed into a 10-second journey."
That observation carries a direct commercial implication. A customer who feels rushed into a financial product is also a customer far more likely to raise a grievance, disengage after one transaction, or simply uninstall. And disengagement, in financial services, is the most expensive outcome of all, particularly when the cost of acquiring the next customer has risen by as much as 40 per cent year on year.
Keyur Dhami, SVP of Customer Success at marketing technology firm WebEngage, frames the problem as one of systemic design. "BFSI marketing is entering a phase where the biggest challenge is no longer customer acquisition; it is overcoming consumer doubt," he says. "Even if a campaign achieves the highest click-through rates or app install counts, it signifies nothing if customers abandon their journey during sign-up, falter mid-KYC, do not respond to prompts and reminders, and disengage after a single purchase. All these actions demonstrate a lack of faith in the product or service offered."
The surge of AI-generated content and finfluencer-driven recommendations has further complicated the trust equation. With SEBI having intervened on unregistered investment advisors operating through social media, and consumer protection bodies flagging dark patterns in financial app design, the environment in which BFSI brands are marketing has become significantly more contested and significantly more consequential for those who get it wrong.
Trust as a Quantifiable Business Metric
What is new and significant about this moment is not that BFSI brands have suddenly discovered the value of trust. What is new is that trust is being operationalised. It is being assigned numbers, tracked on dashboards, and tied to business outcomes in ways that make it legible to a CFO, not just a CMO.
Geetanjali Chugh Kothari, Chief Marketing Officer at Generali Central Life Insurance, describes a boardroom conversation that has evolved materially. "There is increasing emphasis on trust scores, grievance resolution, quality of advisory engagement, customer retention, and overall customer confidence," she says. "Clicks and installs may signal visibility but say little about the strength of a customer relationship." For Kothari, metrics like NPS are gaining prominence precisely because they capture something that a download number never could. "Metrics such as Net Promoter Score are gaining prominence as they capture how customers truly feel and whether they would recommend a brand. Alongside this, multi-holding and retention are emerging as stronger indicators of durable relationships and long-term value."
The concept of multi-holding, where a customer holds more than one product with the same financial institution, is particularly instructive. It is a metric that cannot be faked or gamed by a performance campaign. It requires the customer to have made an active choice, more than once, to extend their confidence to the same brand. "For us, NPS has never been just a number," Kothari adds. "In financial services, especially life insurance, trust is not an add-on; it is the product itself. It is built in moments of truth, through seamless claim settlement, convenience, and transparency at every interaction."
That framing has a direct bearing on where marketing investment should logically flow. If the AI Overviews disruption is shrinking the return on paid search and performance formats, and if trust-led metrics like retention and multi-holding are the real indicators of commercial health, then the budget calculus that pours disproportionate spend into top-of-funnel acquisition while underinvesting in the post-onboarding experience is overdue for revision.
Where Engagement Goes Next
The emerging answer to the trust problem in BFSI is not a retreat from digital, but a fundamental redesign of what digital engagement is expected to deliver. Brands are moving from acquisition-first campaigns toward what might be described as confidence-led journeys, where every touchpoint: from onboarding to grievance handling to a fraud alert on WhatsApp, is understood as an opportunity to either build or erode trust.
Dhami points to a specific behavioural pattern emerging among leading digital banking and investment platforms. "Multiple digital banking and investment applications are using customer behaviour data to recognise hesitation and nudge customers through guided self-service, through educational content, simpler processes, and hand-off for human intervention, as opposed to repeating sales conversations for abandoned applications, dormant portfolios, or discontinued policy applications," he says. The logic is not to push harder. It is to make it safe enough for the customer to continue. "Automation with authentic interaction will be the key to the future of BFSI marketing."
Mascarenhas identifies poor grievance handling as the single most underestimated trust risk in the sector today — more damaging, he argues, than a misleading campaign or an aggressive targeting strategy. "In finance, trust is rarely broken in one dramatic moment. Robotic replies, delayed resolutions, or a lack of accountability can shake confidence far more deeply than a bad campaign ever could." He frames the broader direction of travel with a clarity that signals where the industry's strategic conversation is heading. "The conversation is gradually shifting from 'How fast can we acquire customers?' to 'How confidently can consumers stay with us?'"
That shift in framing, from velocity to confidence, from installs to relationships, from clicks to trust, may well define the next phase of BFSI marketing in India. The economics are beginning to demand it. When organic visibility is shrinking, paid acquisition costs are climbing, and consumer scepticism is at a measurable high, the only lever left that does not require ever-increasing spend is the one that should have been the foundation all along.
Kothari's closing thought is worth sitting with. "The brands that endure will not be the loudest, but the most consistent." In a sector navigating AI disruption, regulatory tightening, and a consumer base that has grown considerably more cautious, consistency may be the most commercially valuable attribute a financial brand can possess. The click was never the point. It was always what came after.
Read more news about Marketing News, Advertising News, PR and Corporate Communication News, Digital News, People Movement News
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube & Google News
