Middle age is the new youth. But guess who hasn’t noticed?

Guest Column: Shveta Singh, founder of Iridescent Lens and independent marketing consultant, explores the growing gap between how middle age is experienced today and how businesses market to it

e4m by Shveta Singh
Published: Aug 26, 2026 9:44 AM  | 4 min read
Shveta Singh, founder of Iridescent Lens
  • e4m Twitter
  • The phrase "50 is the new 40" oversimplifies modern aging, as people today live longer, healthier lives and often postpone traditional life milestones, leading to a shift in behavior and aspirations across age groups.
  • Social commentators describe this trend as the 'Extension of Midlife', where older adults engage in activities typically associated with youth, challenging stereotypes about aging.
  • Advertising often fails to accurately represent older adults, with a significant underrepresentation and reliance on outdated stereotypes, which do not reflect the realities of modern consumers over 50.
  • The advertising industry’s ageism and focus on youth demographics overlook the growing financial power and diverse interests of older consumers, suggesting a need for brands to rethink their approach to marketing across age groups.

There is perhaps no bigger lie in modern ageing than the phrase “50 is the new 40.”

Because ageing is no longer a number formula. The phrase just moves the expectation to a different age.

A 50-year-old today does not necessarily live, look, think or behave like a 50-year-old did a generation ago. We are living longer, staying healthier for longer, and postponing many of the life stages that were once expected to arrive at a particular age.

But this phenomenon goes beyond what is visible in the mirror.

We are, in many ways, down-ageing in our behaviour, attitudes and aspirations. Social and cultural commentators often view this paradigm shift as the 'Extension of Midlife'.

The social expectations that once dictated milestones for ages 25, 35, 45 or 55 are becoming gradually obsolete. A 60-year-old can be more experimental than a 25-year-old. A 50-year-old can be changing careers, learning, partying or falling in love. Meanwhile, a 25-year-old may be financially anxious and exhausted.

Perhaps a more useful way to think about this phenomenon is: ‘Youth is no longer necessarily a demographic. It is a mindset.’

Older adults don’t necessarily “wind down”. Retirement is no longer the beginning of withdrawal from life. Many now consider middle age a launchpad, an opportunity for reinvention.

But guess who hasn’t quite noticed this fundamental shift?

Advertising.
Media.
Brands.
Businesses.

One of the glaring blind spots in modern marketing is the disconnect between how people over 50 actually live and how advertising represents them.

Middle-aged and older people are not just underrepresented. They are often shown stereotypically.

According to the collaborative Diversity & Inclusion in Indian Advertising report by the Advertising Standards Council of India, the Unstereotype Alliance and Kantar, only 4% of ads feature people aged 65 and above. Additionally, we see that older people tend to be associated disproportionately with financial services, health and other age-coded categories.

Advertising continues to operate with an almost 1980s mental blueprint of middle age. In that world, a 50-year-old is a sedentary, brand-loyal traditionalist, beginning to worry about retirement and health.

The greying man planning his pension. The older couple celebrating an anniversary. The mother giving life advice. The vulnerable senior who needs insurance, healthcare or a supplement.

These people exist, of course. The problem is that they are not the whole story.

But the bigger problem is not even representation. It is context.

Today’s 55-year-old is not necessarily waiting to be told how to prepare for old age. They may be buying the same sneakers, smartphones, cars, travel packages, streaming subscriptions and experiences as someone 30 years younger.

They may be building a second career. They may be travelling alone. They may be dating again. They may be going to the gym, starting a business or simply deciding that the next 20 years should be lived differently from the last 20.

When advertising reduces this person to their age, it is building dissonance rather than relevance, and it is missing a massive demographic opportunity.

Why has this happened?

Partly because there is an ageism problem within the industry itself. Young creative directors, planners and media teams do not understand the lived reality of a generation much older than them. In the absence of understanding, stereotypes become a convenient substitute.

Then there is the convenience of demographics. “Youth” is an easy target. It is easier to sell a brief around “18-34” than to ask what actually makes someone youthful.

There is also the industry’s obsession with mass appeal. Stereotypes work because they are instantly recognisable. The problem is that recognisable is not always relevant.

And finally, there is the myth that older consumers don’t matter commercially.

This is probably the most expensive assumption of all.

India is moving towards a much larger affluent consumer base, with a growing share of older consumers. The consumers entering their 50s and 60s enjoy greater financial independence and buying power today.

While brands compete aggressively for the wallet of Gen Z, an older and often more financially established consumer is being overlooked.

This is not an argument for replacing young people in advertising with older people. It is an argument for abandoning the assumption that age tells us what people want.

So the question businesses need to ask today is not, “How old is my consumer?” but rather, “What does age actually mean to them?”

 

Published On: Aug 26, 2026 9:44 AM