Top Story

e4m_logo.png

Home >> Media - TV >> Article

Zee plea: HC tells BCCI not to finalise deal

10-February-2005
Font Size   16
Zee plea: HC tells BCCI not to finalise deal

Zee Telefilms on Wednesday got a breather from the Madras High Court which directed the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) not to finalise any tender or contract for telecast of the forthcoming Indo-Pak cricket series till February 17.

Zee TV, in its petition, contended that the BCCI having awarded to it the contract for telecast of the various matches in India to be played in March-April, had by a communication dated September 21, 2004, informed the cancellation of the contract.

Zee submitted that among the bidders, its bid was the highest at $260 million (Rs 1,260 crore) with the ESPN/Star Sports being the second with $230 million. Zee said it had also paid $20 million as advance to the BCCI.

Mr Justice K.P. Sivasubramaniam, who heard the preliminary submissions by counsels of both sides, adjourned the case to February 17. He asked the first respondent (BCCI) not to finalise the bid or contract till then. The respondents were directed to file their counters by February 14.

The BCCI, according to the petitioner, had invited tenders for telecast of cricket matches in India for the period October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2008. In response, the petitioner had submitted its tender on August 14, 2004. Having bid for the highest amount, the tender was awarded to the petitioner. Subsequently, however, the BCCI communicated the cancellation of the contract "on reasons and grounds" that were "frivolous", the petitioner said.

From media reports, the petitioner said it had learnt that even when the BCCI had decided to award the contract in its favour, the cricket board was reported to be negotiating with all other sports channels whose bids were lower than those of the petitioner, to cover the Indo-Pak series. The petitioner was ready to cover the forthcoming series and was also willing to deposit the entire advertisement revenue before this court. The petitioner prayed that to protect its interest and that of the viewers, the court might issue appropriate orders for telecast of the series.

The petitioner also prayed for issue of an interim injunction restraining the BCCI from permitting coverage of cricket matches in India, by other than the Prasar Bharati, which allowed free-to-air broadcast, on the basis of signals to be provided by the petitioner.

Tags

Vijay Mansukhani, speaks to exchange4media about the resurgence of Onida, the scope of growth of consumer electronics market in India and the reasons why Indian consumer electronics brands don’t compete on a global scale

Projjol Banerjea opens up about hiring Anne Macdonald and GroupM's Rob Norman, and the brand's new identity

Meera Iyer tells exchange4media that in FY 2016/17, bigbasket clocked a revenue of Rs 1,400 crore. The online supermarket currently stands at 70,000 orders a day, with operations in 25 cities.

CMO, Kashyap Vadapalli on the start-up’s marketing play, why it has decided to stay away from IPL and response to its furniture rental apps

Meanwhile Radio City and Radio Mirchi ruled Bangalore and Kolkata respectively

Pankaj Belwariar, who recently resigned from the post of Vice President Marketing at Sakal Media Group, has now joined Rajasthan Patrika as the Head of Marketing in North and East region.

A look at Vivo’s ad campaign with their all-new brand ambassador Aamir Khan, which has fetched them a whopping 21 million views on YouTube