Top Story

e4m_logo.png

Home >> Media – Print >> Article

BCCL sends legal notice to Paranjoy Guha Thakurta over article on FT

25-April-2013
Font Size   16
Share
BCCL sends legal notice to Paranjoy Guha Thakurta over article on FT

An article written by independent journalist Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, titled ‘Financial Times: Whose intellectual property?’ which appeared in business daily Mint on February 4, 2013, has earned the ire of Bennett, Coleman & Co (BCCL).

BCCL has sent a legal notice to Guha Thakurta a couple of days back in this regard.

The article pertained to the legal battle between UK-based Pearson-owned daily Financial Times (FT) and BCCL’s Times Publishing House (TPH) over the right to the title ‘Financial Times’ in India, which came up for hearing in Supreme Court on February 4, 2013.

When contacted by exchange4media, Guha Thakurta confirmed the news and said, “I have received a legal notice from KC Dutta and Associates regarding the article.”

On his next step, he replied, “I am in the process of replying to that notice.”

As is known, BCCL and FTL have been fighting the case since 1993. In 2001, FT had said that BCCL had infringed on its trademark by publishing a supplement called ‘Financial Times’ with The Economic Times and filed a trademark suit against BCCL seeking protection of its trademark ‘FT’ in India.

The Times Group had registered the title ‘Financial Times’ in Delhi in 1991, according to data available with the Registrar of Newspapers for India (RNI).

In April 2012, the tribunal body, Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB), decided that there was no evidence to suggest ‘use’ in India from 1948, as claimed by Financial Times (FTL), and ordered removal of the FTL mark from the register, following TPH’s application. However, it allowed FTL’s rectification application against the mark ‘Financial Times’ registered by TPH, saying, “There is clear evidence to show that the use of the words ‘Financial Times’ would indicate FTL and no one else. The mark is associated in the minds of the Indian readers with the UK paper, that is, FTL, and not the Financial Times of any other country.”

The Tribunal also said that FTL was not violating the provisions of the Press and Registration of Books Act (PRB Act) as it was only circulating and not printing and/or publishing the newspaper in India, and the PRB Act would not apply to it.

FTL then filed a writ before the Delhi High Court challenging the IPAB order on the limited point of its trademark being cancelled.

In July 2012, FT CEO John Ridding had made it clear through an ad that FT was not in any way associated with the Indian title of the same name published by TPH.
 

Baba Ramdev brought his sharp wits for an interview with e4m where he promised to disrupt more markets and spoke about he the way he created a brand through consistent and selfless work

GroupM is in talks with several digital clients currently with its other agencies to shift them to Essence, which is looking at a major expansion plan in 2018

Thomas, Chief Marketing Officer, Diageo India, gives us a peek into the marketing strategy for McDowell’s No 1 Soda, its creation of ‘No 1 Yaari Jam,’ their own set of 4Ps and importance of content

NewsCode, a hyper local online news platform was launched last night with a network of over 350 local reporters in Karnataka and Jharkhand. Apurv Swarup, the co-founder talked to Exchange4Media about his vision

Voot, which is producing almost 4X content on an overall basis on the reality drama, is gunning for big numbers both on viewership and advertising revenue

YouTube today released its annual year-end edition of the YouTube Ads Leaderboard 2017 capturing the most celebrated ads that received maximum views, shares, and love from audiences across India

Real world study of Appier's network shows significant benefits of AI over traditional rule-based systems