|
A few questions that
will be answered, if you choose to read on:
1. Potential of Radio as a reach medium is as high as Print
options (if not more) in Delhi & Mumbai
2. Average time spent listening to Radio is as good as average
TV viewing time
3. Prime time definition: is it different by medium?
Till just a few months ago, we also believed Radio to be a
"wallpaper" or a "passive" media option,
good enough to reach just 8-10% of potential audience, across
markets. We always related Radio to the average middle class,
which does not have a choice other than listening to some
old Hindi songs of the 60's.
Many of us living in the big few metros have begun to acknowledge
that "Radio seems to be growing, thanks to the private
FM stations". But may be we just left it that, merrily
continuing to spend our advertising investments, 75-80% on
TV, some on Print/outdoor media options, miniscule percentage
on Radio or Internet. Not to forget the magazines, if any
one of our colleagues remind us that "we need to have
a follow-up campaign in select magazines", because housewives
need to know more about the product offering. More introspection
follows, when our bosses insist otherwise.
Think again. Look at some of the facts, backed by numbers,
which tell a different story.
1. Reach potential of Radio has doubled or tripled
In Mumbai and Delhi, every third individual listens to Radio
"yesterday".
(Base: All Adults, 12 + Years, All SEC)

So much so, at an overall level, Radio offers the potential
to reach more than the local Print options. (Caution: we know
that you'll use your wisdom, not to compare these numbers, on
an apple to apple basis, considering the consumption patterns
of the respective media options and their inherent strengths
and weaknesses.)
2. Time spent listening to Radio is as much as TV viewing
time
If we consider anyone who listens to Radio for at least 5
minutes within a 15-minute slot, and treat him as a "listener",
then:
On an average a Mumbaikar (34% of 12+ Universe) listens to
Radio for 2.35 hours a day, while his Delhi counterpart listens
for slightly longer at 2.45 hours a day.
This is just about a fraction more or less, when compared
to the average TV viewing time in these cities.
Interestingly, this intensity of time spent on listening
to Radio does not vary too much, be it the upper SEC A or
the lower SECs of D/E (whereas we all know the pattern on
TV, even within the TV viewing universe).
3. What is Prime time?
As expected, popular prime time definitions for Radio and
TV are very different. Radio rules in popularity till about
late evening, and tapers down, post 6 PM.

Now, when do the actual transactions happen for most "impulse"
categories & FMCGs? What happens in case of purchase behaviour
when someone listens to Radio on way to a shopping mall? Who
was referring to "recency planning" recently? Check
it out for yourself.
If you are not still convinced about the "power of Radio",
here are some additional insights favouring Radio as a good
advertising and promotional medium:
Intensity of listening to Radio is higher amongst Males than
Females
On the other hand, females are more intense TV viewers
The lower age group of <30 years (with higher nagging power)
form a core set of Radio listeners.
Now, is it time to replace "our intuitive sense"
or "historical wisdom" with some " real facts"
backed by syndicated research?
Source: IRS `03-04 & ILT `04 from Media Research Users
Council
|