Women's magazines have a considerable male readership and men's magazines have a considerable female readership- we very well know that! What bothered us was, does the same hold true for TV, specifically pageants like the Miss Universe?
So this time we analyze pageants and try to find out the viewership trends for the same, along with what media planner and buyers do or don't do right. Our scope of study would be the three recent events: Miss Universe pageant, Grasim Mr. India and Gladrags Mega Model.
Take a look at the graphs below; the viewership of the Miss Universe pageant. While the ratings are decent, clearly, the pageant viewership was skewed towards males; the highest being in Delhi with almost no female audience. The city of Mumbai was an exception though, with more female viewers for the beauty pageant.
Similarly, look at the next two graphs for Grasim Mr. India and Gladrags Mega Model- both male pageants. Again we see the same trend with a clear, but less prominent skew towards women viewers. The combined market, for example, has almost double the female viewers and Mumbai has an approximate 40 times greater female viewership in the Grasim Mr. India 2002. Again, in Gladrags Mega Model, with the exception of Bangalore, and Delhi, all the other markets had a greater number of female viewers. The trend was most prominently marked in Mumbai, where women viewers were 240 times more than the male viewers.
What we just saw in the three graphs above is a very clear indication that the readership trends that print experiences, is broadly applicable to TV as well. Our conclusion therefore: Female beauty pageants attract a great deal of male viewership and male pageants see a fair deal of female viewership!
But are the advertisers and the agencies using this insight? If the brand monitoring data for the three events is any indicator, then, not exactly! If one were to look at the advertisers on these pageants, they certainly don't seem to be observing the viewership pattern of such events. Miss Universe for example, was used for advertising women's products more. While the male category saw a total of 500 sec. of advertising on the pageant, the female category saw a total of 730 sec. (See table 1 below)
Table 1: Miss Universe - Products for women dominate.
|
Most advertised categories during each of the events
|
| |
Miss Universe '2002'
|
|
| Products |
Duration in seconds |
Male Category |
Female category |
| Two wheelers |
320 |
320 |
|
| Cellular Phones |
180 |
180 |
180 |
| Perfumes/Deo |
180 |
|
180 |
| Branded jewellery |
120 |
|
120 |
| Hair oil |
100 |
|
100 |
| Refrigerator |
50 |
|
50 |
| Cosmetics |
100 |
|
100 |
| |
1050 |
500 |
730 |
A closer look at the male pageants now. Grasim Mr. India and Gladrags Mega Model. Again, have a look at the products advertised on the two. Needless to say, the advertisers seem to be doing exactly what they did for the Miss Universe pageant. Not taking notice of the skew of viewership for these events, the advertisers go in for advertising more male products here as well. Here the male category attracted a total of 430 and 380 seconds respectively, and the female category attracted a total of 325 and 120 seconds respectively.
| |
Grasim Mr. India '2002' |
|
| Products |
Duration in seconds |
Male Category |
Female category |
| Suitings |
20 |
20 |
|
| Readymade Garments |
50 |
50 |
|
| Fairness cream |
10 |
|
10 |
| Camera |
60 |
60 |
60 |
| Talcum |
30 |
|
30 |
| Perfume/Deo(male) |
45 |
45 |
|
| Cellular |
60 |
60 |
60 |
| Two wheelers |
45 |
45 |
|
| Sampoo |
90 |
|
90 |
| Hair oil |
35 |
|
35 |
| Lubricant |
70 |
70 |
|
| Tooth pest |
40 |
40 |
40 |
| Car/jeep |
40 |
40 |
|
| |
595 |
430 |
325 |
| |
| |
Gladrags Mega Model Man hunt |
| Products |
Duration in seconds |
Male Category |
Female category |
| Suitings |
180 |
180 |
|
| Sanitary Napkins |
120 |
|
120 |
| Readymade Garments |
120 |
120 |
|
| Two wheelers |
80 |
80 |
|
| |
500 |
380 |
120 |
One obvious question that arises is, what are these advertisers their brands on? From our observations, they are certainly not banking on the viewership trends of these events. So is it the parallel 'image' of these events that motivates them so that their brands get the right image rub-off? Whatever is the case, one cannot comment on their decisions. But there is certainly one thing that we religiously believe in: what would the right image association do for them if they do not have the right audience for the same.
Some food for thought?