|
IRS
Study
ü
IRS
2002 is the first study in India to use Census 2001 estimates in
all aspects of research design. Census 2001 findings have been incorporated
both in universe determination and sample allocation.
| |
Urban
|
%
Chng
|
Rural
|
%
Chng
|
|
STATE
|
2001
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
2002
|
|
|
All India
|
195555
|
208890
|
7
|
512218
|
503504
|
-2
|
|
Maharashtra
|
27842
|
31059
|
12
|
43614
|
39306
|
-10
|
|
MP
|
11291
|
11515
|
2
|
32876
|
29897
|
-9
|
|
Gujarat
|
13307
|
13731
|
3
|
22103
|
23001
|
4
|
|
Goa
|
435
|
494
|
14
|
569
|
533
|
-6
|
|
AP
|
16758
|
15099
|
-10
|
42153
|
40311
|
-4
|
|
Tamil Nadu
|
17467
|
21966
|
26
|
33199
|
26133
|
-21
|
|
Karnataka
|
12157
|
13437
|
11
|
25937
|
24626
|
-5
|
|
Kerala
|
6733
|
6529
|
-3
|
17499
|
18896
|
8
|
|
UP
|
23576
|
24390
|
3
|
85971
|
88514
|
3
|
|
Rajasthan
|
9188
|
9378
|
2
|
28160
|
29368
|
4
|
|
Punjab
|
5550
|
6145
|
11
|
12207
|
11648
|
-5
|
|
Haryana
|
3784
|
4506
|
19
|
10256
|
10245
|
0
|
|
Chandigarh
|
582
|
626
|
8
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
Delhi
|
8473
|
9659
|
14
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
Uttranchal
|
1392
|
1613
|
16
|
3977
|
4329
|
9
|
|
HP
|
427
|
473
|
11
|
4049
|
3986
|
-2
|
|
West Bengal
|
18135
|
18065
|
0
|
41580
|
39810
|
-4
|
|
Bihar
|
5590
|
6091
|
9
|
45640
|
49722
|
9
|
|
Orissa
|
3860
|
4155
|
8
|
22810
|
22341
|
-2
|
|
Jharkhand
|
3936
|
4295
|
9
|
13867
|
13947
|
1
|
|
Assam
|
2415
|
2613
|
8
|
16394
|
15435
|
-6
|
|
Chattisgarh
|
2657
|
3051
|
15
|
9357
|
11456
|
22
|
Impact of Census (All Figs for
12+ Individuals (000’s)
ü
As
can be inferred from the above table, Census has impacted the universe
estimates of different States by varying degrees. Please bear in
mind that the estimates of 2002 v/s 2001 have a gap of 1½ year between
them.
Corrections in
SEC profile
ü
Corrections
in SEC profile is not uniform, either across markets or for Products’
Usage/ Ownership. Therefore, it is imperative that any trend information
across IRS rounds should be analysed in the context of Census 2001
based changes.
|
( Variable
|
2001 (000’s)
|
2002(000’s)
|
2001 %
|
2002%
|
|
SEC A
|
18647
|
18788
|
9.5
|
9
|
|
SEC B
|
33291
|
34778
|
17
|
16.7
|
|
SEC C
|
41609
|
44155
|
21.3
|
21.1
|
|
SEC D
|
44527
|
49505
|
22.8
|
23.7
|
|
SEC E
|
57479
|
61672
|
29.4
|
29.5
|
|
Total
|
195553
|
208898
|
100
|
100
|
ü
SEC
profile of Urban India has seen a correction in the penetration
%ages. Negative in case of Upper SEC’s A & B and corresponding
positive change in the lower SECs C, D & E. This is due to the
changes in the Census Classification of Urban and Rural areas in
2001 vis-à-vis 1991. (This does not imply that the SEC AB universe
has shrunk in absolute numbers but has changed as a ratio to the
overall Universe)
|
City
|
SEC A
|
SEC B
|
SEC C
|
SEC D
|
SEC E
|
| |
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
|
Agra
|
11.0
|
7.5
|
15.2
|
16.3
|
19.7
|
18.2
|
22.0
|
27.2
|
32.2
|
30.9
|
|
Ahmedabad
|
13.4
|
13.5
|
18.9
|
18.9
|
23.3
|
20.5
|
25.4
|
26.5
|
19.1
|
20.6
|
|
Allahabad
|
14.2
|
18.4
|
22.5
|
22.8
|
26.6
|
17.6
|
16.9
|
16.1
|
19.9
|
25.2
|
|
Amritsar
|
15.1
|
14.0
|
21.9
|
22.9
|
21.4
|
23.9
|
19.2
|
18.9
|
22.4
|
20.3
|
|
Bangalore
|
13.8
|
12.3
|
19.1
|
14.8
|
26.7
|
27.5
|
18.0
|
22.3
|
22.4
|
23.2
|
|
Bhopal
|
13.3
|
13.0
|
15.5
|
16.0
|
18.1
|
18.6
|
20.6
|
20.8
|
32.3
|
31.6
|
|
Chandigarh
|
18.4
|
18.2
|
23.0
|
19.5
|
24.6
|
22.8
|
15.8
|
15.3
|
18.2
|
24.1
|
|
Chennai
|
11.1
|
13.7
|
15.3
|
16.1
|
25.6
|
23.2
|
24.9
|
23.8
|
23.1
|
23.2
|
|
Coimbatore
|
9.8
|
9.8
|
15.1
|
16.2
|
23.8
|
26.5
|
28.7
|
26.9
|
22.5
|
20.5
|
|
Delhi
|
18.8
|
16.7
|
23.7
|
20.7
|
21.2
|
22.1
|
18.1
|
19.2
|
18.2
|
21.3
|
|
Dhanbad
|
8.8
|
9.5
|
21.7
|
20.7
|
23.7
|
22.1
|
19.8
|
22.3
|
25.9
|
25.5
|
|
Faridabad
|
12.3
|
15.4
|
22.2
|
17.2
|
23.2
|
26.1
|
21.6
|
21.2
|
20.7
|
20.4
|
|
Guwahati
|
18.4
|
16.3
|
25.1
|
29.7
|
18.6
|
17.8
|
19.4
|
19.3
|
18.5
|
17.0
|
|
Hyderabad
|
13.4
|
14.9
|
16.6
|
15.4
|
19.7
|
19.5
|
20.3
|
19.0
|
30.0
|
31.2
|
|
Indore
|
15.3
|
14.0
|
18.0
|
17.6
|
18.5
|
15.5
|
23.2
|
27.3
|
25.1
|
25.8
|
|
Jabalpur
|
9.0
|
10.3
|
16.5
|
16.1
|
19.5
|
23.1
|
23.8
|
23.9
|
31.3
|
26.6
|
|
Jaipur
|
17.4
|
15.5
|
20.9
|
21.5
|
20.2
|
20.0
|
19.2
|
20.1
|
22.2
|
22.8
|
|
Jamshedpur
|
7.2
|
8.8
|
20.6
|
21.9
|
27.1
|
26.1
|
20.6
|
21.9
|
24.5
|
21.4
|
|
Kanpur
|
17.2
|
12.6
|
18.9
|
19.6
|
22.0
|
21.3
|
19.2
|
22.0
|
22.7
|
24.4
|
|
Kochi
|
6.3
|
4.8
|
16.3
|
19.1
|
19.9
|
23.1
|
29.6
|
27.0
|
27.9
|
25.9
|
|
Kolkatta
|
11.1
|
8.5
|
18.3
|
16.9
|
19.1
|
17.7
|
23.5
|
26.6
|
28.0
|
30.3
|
|
Kozhikode
|
4.9
|
3.8
|
9.6
|
13.2
|
14.2
|
23.0
|
37.0
|
27.9
|
34.4
|
32.2
|
|
Lucknow
|
20.1
|
19.1
|
18.7
|
19.4
|
18.0
|
16.6
|
18.0
|
18.8
|
25.2
|
26.1
|
|
Ludhiana
|
16.7
|
14.2
|
22.0
|
20.8
|
26.0
|
25.3
|
19.3
|
23.1
|
16.0
|
16.6
|
|
Madurai
|
8.8
|
6.6
|
12.2
|
18.8
|
23.8
|
23.6
|
30.5
|
26.9
|
24.7
|
24.0
|
< | 
