|
IRS
Study
ü
IRS
2002 is the first study in India to use Census 2001 estimates in
all aspects of research design. Census 2001 findings have been incorporated
both in universe determination and sample allocation.
| |
Urban
|
%
Chng
|
Rural
|
%
Chng
|
|
STATE
|
2001
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
2002
|
|
|
All India
|
195555
|
208890
|
7
|
512218
|
503504
|
-2
|
|
Maharashtra
|
27842
|
31059
|
12
|
43614
|
39306
|
-10
|
|
MP
|
11291
|
11515
|
2
|
32876
|
29897
|
-9
|
|
Gujarat
|
13307
|
13731
|
3
|
22103
|
23001
|
4
|
|
Goa
|
435
|
494
|
14
|
569
|
533
|
-6
|
|
AP
|
16758
|
15099
|
-10
|
42153
|
40311
|
-4
|
|
Tamil Nadu
|
17467
|
21966
|
26
|
33199
|
26133
|
-21
|
|
Karnataka
|
12157
|
13437
|
11
|
25937
|
24626
|
-5
|
|
Kerala
|
6733
|
6529
|
-3
|
17499
|
18896
|
8
|
|
UP
|
23576
|
24390
|
3
|
85971
|
88514
|
3
|
|
Rajasthan
|
9188
|
9378
|
2
|
28160
|
29368
|
4
|
|
Punjab
|
5550
|
6145
|
11
|
12207
|
11648
|
-5
|
|
Haryana
|
3784
|
4506
|
19
|
10256
|
10245
|
0
|
|
Chandigarh
|
582
|
626
|
8
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
Delhi
|
8473
|
9659
|
14
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
Uttranchal
|
1392
|
1613
|
16
|
3977
|
4329
|
9
|
|
HP
|
427
|
473
|
11
|
4049
|
3986
|
-2
|
|
West Bengal
|
18135
|
18065
|
0
|
41580
|
39810
|
-4
|
|
Bihar
|
5590
|
6091
|
9
|
45640
|
49722
|
9
|
|
Orissa
|
3860
|
4155
|
8
|
22810
|
22341
|
-2
|
|
Jharkhand
|
3936
|
4295
|
9
|
13867
|
13947
|
1
|
|
Assam
|
2415
|
2613
|
8
|
16394
|
15435
|
-6
|
|
Chattisgarh
|
2657
|
3051
|
15
|
9357
|
11456
|
22
|
Impact of Census (All Figs for
12+ Individuals (000’s)
ü
As
can be inferred from the above table, Census has impacted the universe
estimates of different States by varying degrees. Please bear in
mind that the estimates of 2002 v/s 2001 have a gap of 1½ year between
them.
Corrections in
SEC profile
ü
Corrections
in SEC profile is not uniform, either across markets or for Products’
Usage/ Ownership. Therefore, it is imperative that any trend information
across IRS rounds should be analysed in the context of Census 2001
based changes.
|
( Variable
|
2001 (000’s)
|
2002(000’s)
|
2001 %
|
2002%
|
|
SEC A
|
18647
|
18788
|
9.5
|
9
|
|
SEC B
|
33291
|
34778
|
17
|
16.7
|
|
SEC C
|
41609
|
44155
|
21.3
|
21.1
|
|
SEC D
|
44527
|
49505
|
22.8
|
23.7
|
|
SEC E
|
57479
|
61672
|
29.4
|
29.5
|
|
Total
|
195553
|
208898
|
100
|
100
|
ü
SEC
profile of Urban India has seen a correction in the penetration
%ages. Negative in case of Upper SEC’s A & B and corresponding
positive change in the lower SECs C, D & E. This is due to the
changes in the Census Classification of Urban and Rural areas in
2001 vis-à-vis 1991. (This does not imply that the SEC AB universe
has shrunk in absolute numbers but has changed as a ratio to the
overall Universe)
|
City
|
SEC A
|
SEC B
|
SEC C
|
SEC D
|
SEC E
|
| |
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
2001
|
2002
|
|
Agra
|
11.0
|
7.5
|
15.2
|
16.3
|
19.7
|
18.2
|
22.0
|
27.2
|
32.2
|
30.9
|
|
Ahmedabad
|
13.4
|
13.5
|
18.9
|
18.9
|
23.3
|
20.5
|
25.4
|
26.5
|
19.1
|
20.6
|
|
Allahabad
|
14.2
|
18.4
|
22.5
|
22.8
|
26.6
|
17.6
|
16.9
|
16.1
|
19.9
|
25.2
|
|
Amritsar
|
15.1
|
14.0
|
21.9
|
22.9
|
21.4
|
23.9
|
19.2
|
18.9
|
22.4
|
20.3
|
|
Bangalore
|
13.8
|
12.3
|
19.1
|
14.8
|
26.7
|
27.5
|
18.0
|
22.3
|
22.4
|
23.2
|
|
Bhopal
|
13.3
|
13.0
|
15.5
|
16.0
|
18.1
|
18.6
|
20.6
|
20.8
|
32.3
|
31.6
|
|
Chandigarh
|
18.4
|
18.2
|
23.0
|
19.5
|
24.6
|
22.8
|
15.8
|
15.3
|
18.2
|
24.1
|
|
Chennai
|
11.1
|
13.7
|
15.3
|
16.1
|
25.6
|
23.2
|
24.9
|
23.8
|
23.1
|
23.2
|
|
Coimbatore
|
9.8
|
9.8
|
15.1
|
16.2
|
23.8
|
26.5
|
28.7
|
26.9
|
22.5
|
20.5
|
|
Delhi
|
18.8
|
16.7
|
23.7
|
20.7
|
21.2
|
22.1
|
18.1
|
19.2
|
18.2
|
21.3
|
|
Dhanbad
|
8.8
|
9.5
|
21.7
|
20.7
|
23.7
|
22.1
|
19.8
|
22.3
|
25.9
|
25.5
|
|
Faridabad
|
12.3
|
15.4
|
22.2
|
17.2
|
23.2
|
26.1
|
21.6
|
21.2
|
20.7
|
20.4
|
|
Guwahati
|
18.4
|
16.3
|
25.1
|
29.7
|
18.6
|
17.8
|
19.4
|
19.3
|
18.5
|
17.0
|
|
Hyderabad
|
13.4
|
14.9
|
16.6
|
15.4
|
19.7
|
19.5
|
20.3
|
19.0
|
30.0
|
31.2
|
|
Indore
|
15.3
|
14.0
|
18.0
|
17.6
|
18.5
|
15.5
|
23.2
|
27.3
|
25.1
|
25.8
|
|
Jabalpur
|
9.0
|
10.3
|
16.5
|
16.1
|
19.5
|
23.1
|
23.8
|
23.9
|
31.3
|
26.6
|
|
Jaipur
|
17.4
|
15.5
|
20.9
|
21.5
|
20.2
|
20.0
|
19.2
|
20.1
|
22.2
|
22.8
|
|
Jamshedpur
|
7.2
|
8.8
|
20.6
|
21.9
|
27.1
|
26.1
|
20.6
|
21.9
|
24.5
|
21.4
|
|
Kanpur
|
17.2
|
12.6
|
18.9
|
19.6
|
22.0
|
21.3
|
19.2
|
22.0
|
22.7
|
24.4
|
|
Kochi
|
6.3
|
4.8
|
16.3
|
19.1
|
19.9
|
23.1
|
29.6
|
27.0
|
27.9
|
25.9
|
|
Kolkatta
|
11.1
|
8.5
|
18.3
|
16.9
|
19.1
|
17.7
|
23.5
|
26.6
|
28.0
|
30.3
|
|
Kozhikode
|
4.9
|
3.8
|
9.6
|
13.2
|
14.2
|
23.0
|
37.0
|
27.9
|
34.4
|
32.2
|
|
Lucknow
|
20.1
|
19.1
|
18.7
|
19.4
|
18.0
|
16.6
|
18.0
|
18.8
|
25.2
|
26.1
|
|
Ludhiana
|
16.7
|
14.2
|
22.0
|
20.8
|
26.0
|
25.3
|
19.3
|
23.1
|
16.0
|
16.6
|
|
Madurai
|
8.8
|
6.6
|
12.2
|
18.8
|
23.8
|
23.6
|
30.5
|
26.9
|
24.7
|
24.0
|
|
Meerut
|
14.2
|
12.1
|
21.2
|
23.5
|
15.3
|
20.4
|
22.9
|
19.3
|
26.5
|
24.8
|
|
Mumbai
|
10.1
|
10.1
|
15.7
|
15.9
|
27.9
|
29.0
|
24.4
|
25.2
|
21.9
|
19.9
|
|
Nagpur
|
11.3
|
10.2
|
16.2
|
17.9
|
23.2
|
22.5
|
24.4
|
24.8
|
24.9
|
24.7
|
|
Patna
|
16.7
|
20.0
|
23.6
|
21.2
|
19.0
|
16.2
|
18.5
|
19.4
|
22.1
|
23.2
|
|
Pune
|
11.4
|
11.0
|
16.3
|
15.0
|
27.6
|
26.3
|
24.0
|
22.7
|
20.8
|
25.0
|
|
Rajkot
|
11.5
|
13.0
|
20.1
|
19.3
|
27.0
|
23.7
|
20.6
|
24.2
|
20.7
|
19.9
|
|
Ranchi
|
15.5
|
14.8
|
19.7
|
19.1
|
18.4
|
19.4
|
22.8
|
20.5
|
23.4
|
26.2
|
|
Surat
|
10.4
|
9.2
|
11.2
|
11.2
|
20.5
|
23.6
|
30.3
|
29.3
|
27.5
|
26.6
|
|
Thiruvanthapuram
|
12.5
|
12.3
|
16.1
|
18.3
|
16.7
|
18.8
|
25.7
|
27.5
|
28.9
|
22.9
|
|
Vadodara
|
17.2
|
17.0
|
18.4
|
21.3
|
20.9
|
23.5
|
21.7
|
21.4
|
21.6
|
16.7
|
|
Varanasi
|
14.8
|
14.4
|
16.8
|
17.0
|
16.8
|
16.7
|
22.4
|
23.4
|
29.3
|
28.5
|
|
Vishakhapatnam
|
11.8
|
9.5
|
12.9
|
12.7
|
19.8
|
22.8
|
20.7
|
21.8
|
34.7
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
Similar
changes are observed at pop-strata, SCR levels
ü
IRS
is a sample survey and hence any estimate will have an associated
error tolerance level. IRS strictly follows a relative error range
of 15% at 90% confidence limit for variables penetrated at 10%.
IRS 2002 - List of Product Categories Validated & Released
(79 Categories)
|
FMCG (31)
|
Durables (25)
|
Personal Products (23)
|
|
Antacids
|
Air- Conditioners
|
Chocolates
|
|
Atta
|
Automobiles
|
Chyawanprash
|
|
Ayurvedic products
|
Cellular Phone
|
Credit Card
|
|
Baby Foods
|
Deep Freezer
|
Deodorants
|
|
Bathing Soaps/ liquid soaps
|
Dish Washing Machine
|
Éclairs
|
|
Biscuits
|
Electric Kettle
|
Eye make up
|
|
Cheese
|
Fax/ Answering machine
|
Face make up
|
|
Coffee
|
Internet access at home
|
Hair Dyes/ Colorants
|
|
Cooking Medium
|
Kitchen Sink
|
Hair Oil/ Dressing Oil
|
|
Disposable diapers
|
Microwave Oven
|
Hair wash products brands
|
|
Fabric Bleaches
|
Mopeds
|
Hard Boiled Sweets
|
|
Fabric Whiteners
|
Motorcycles
|
Ice Creams/ Ice Candies
|
|
Floor and toilet cleaners
|
Music System
|
Lipstick
|
|
Fresh Milk
|
Personal Computer
|
Mineral Water
|
|
Glucose
|
Pressure Cooker
|
Mint Lozenges
|
|
Hair oil/ hair dressing
|
Radio Clock
|
Nail Polish
|
|
Hair wash products
|
Refrigerator
|
Readymade Shirts
|
|
Instant Noodles
|
Scooterettes / Scooters
|
Skin Creams/ Lotions/ Petroleum Jellies
|
|
Laxatives
|
Still Camera
|
Soft Drinks/Concentrates and fruit juices
|
|
Milk Food Drinks
|
Telephone
|
Talcum Powder
|
|
Milk powder/Dairy Whiteners
|
Television
|
Toilet soap brands
|
|
Rubs and balms
|
Vacuum Cleaner
|
Tooth Brush
|
|
Salt
|
VCR/ VCP
|
Wrist Watches
|
|
Talcum Powder
|
Video camera/ Camcorder
|
|
|
Tea
|
Washing Machine
|
|
|
Tomato Ketchup/ Sauce
|
|
|
|
Tooth Powder
|
|
|
|
Toothpaste
|
|
|
|
Utensil cleaners
|
|
|
|
Washing cakes/ Bars
|
|
|
|
Washing Powder/ liquids
|
|
|
* Hair wash products and
Deodorants were captured at HH level as well for Hair wash products,
in R10 of IRS 2002 R2. These are not being reported due to half
round sample.
Few
categories wherein additional precaution needs to be exercised are
highlighted below:
- Credit
cards and Cell phone categories show lesser penetration than
expected, but have been released so that they can be used for
profiling. It is recommended that these categories be used with
caution. IRS is keeping these categories in close observation
and has made changes in questionnaire design to take care of underestimation
in coming rounds.
- Chocolate,
Hardboiled sweets and Lozenges have also shown a drop in penetration.
The drop is mostly because of corrections in estimates of upper
SEC’s. In case of Lozenges the drop is also partially explained
by the drop in sales of large brands as ratified by secondary
published data.
- Chyawanprash
also shows a drop which is inline with the 17% de-growth of the
category as ratified by secondary published data.
-
Skin
care category re-classification:
Sub-Category
level classification for Skin Care has always been a complex task,
given the respondents’ frequent inability to relate the recalled
brands to the relevant sub-categories.
In
this reporting, some new sub-categories have been added and certain
brands have been realigned under the respective sub-categories.
- Antiseptic
Creams:Boroline; Boronatural; Boroplus Cream; Borosoft, Boro
Calendula
- Bleaches/
Skin Lighteners :Ayur Instant Bleach; Fem Fairness Bleach;
Fem Instobleach; Jolen Cream Bleach
- Cold
Creams Ayur Herbal All Purpose; Ayur Herbal Cold Cream; Charmis
All Purpose; Fair & Lovely Fairness Cold Cream; Nivea Cream;
Nyle ; Herbal Cold Cream; Ponds Cold Cream; Ponds Oil Balance
Formula
- Cleansers
- Face Wash: Clean & Clear Foaming Face Wash; Lakme PH
Balance Face Wash; Max. Daily Face Wash; Pears Face Wash; Ponds
Face Wash; Ponds Oil Control Face Wash; Synergie Face Wash
- Cleansers
– Milk / Pad :Ayur Cleansing Milk; Lakme Max. Cleansing Milk;
Lakme Deep Pore Cleansing Milk, Lakme Deep Pore Cleansing Pad
- Moisturising
Creams/ Lotions:Ayur Herbal; Clean & Clear Lotion; Clean
& Clear Moisturiser; Fair & Lovely Moisturiser; Johnson
Baby Cream; Johnson Baby Lotion; Lakme H&B Lotion; Lakme Maximum
Moisturising Lotion; Lakme Maximum Oil Free; Lakme Nourishing
Lotion; Lakme Winter Care Lotion; Nivea Body Lotion; Nyle Herbal
Moisturising Lotion;Ponds Dreamflower
- Vanishing
Creams/Snows:Emami Vanishing Cream; Himani Turmeric Vanishing
Cream; Lakme Max. Moisturing Day Cream; Remy Snowsl; Vicco Vanishing
Cream; VI-John Turmeric Cream
- Fairness
Creams : Avon Fairness Face Cream; Emami Naturally
Fair; Fair & Lovely; Fairever; Fair Glow Fairness Cream; Freshia;
Nature Fair; Nivea Visage; Nivea Visage Fairness Cream; Pears
Natural Fairness; Ponds Dream Flower Cream; Revlon Touch &
Glow
- Speciality
Skin Creams/ Lotions:Lactocalamine; Lakme Calamine; Lakme
Maximum Sun Screen; Lakme Protective Sun Screen; Lakme Skin Radiance;
Lakme Skin Revival; Lakme Skin Purifying; Lakme Ultra Satin; Nivea
Body Light; Nivea Body Skin Cream; Nivea Body Skin Dew; Ponds
Age Defying Lotion; Synergie Anti Wrinkle
- Lip
Care:Vaseline; Dr. Lips
- Face
Pack/Scrubs Brands:Cadila Everyouth Scrub; Cadila Orange Peel
Off; Cadila Cucumber Pack; Everyouth Anti Wrinkle; Everyouth Orange
Peel Off; Pears Natural Scrub
- Topical
Ointments :Itchguard; Krack
- Others
Skin Creams:Ayur - Three N Prod; Other IndianCreams/Lotions;Other
Imported Creams/Lotions; Unbranded Creams/Lotions
Highlights
of Skin Cream Category re-classification :
- ‘Cleansers’
sub-category has been further sub-divided into “Cleansers- Face
Wash” and “Cleansers - Milk / Pads”.
- Erstwhile
‘Other Skin Cream’ sub-category is now re-named as “Speciality
Skin Creams / Lotions”. Brands like Lakme Sun Screen, Lakme
Skin Radiance, Lakme Skin Revival, Synergie Anti Wrinkle, Ponds
Age Defying, Lactocalamine, Lakme Calamine, which were earlier
part of other sub- categories like Moisturing creams / Topical
Creams are now re-clasified into this
- Krack
which was earlier part of Heal / Lip Care is now part of “Topical
Ointments” alongwith Itchguard.
********
|