Research
Summary
This
study was devised to find out how effective
radio advertising can be relative to TV,
and to learn more about what kind of radio
advertising is more effective: effectiveness
was gauged in terms of measuring increases
in advertising awareness.
The study tracked perceptions amongst
consumers aged 16-44 for seventeen brands
advertised in two comparable regions.
For each brand, one town had radio advertising
while the other did not. TV advertising
was the same across both towns.
Millward Brown, who conducted the study
across October 1999 to April 2000, model
effectiveness in terms of the Awareness
Index
Across the seventeen brands:
Therefore
radio was, on average, three-fifths as
efficient as TV at driving advertising
awareness amongst radio listeners.
In
terms of price advertising agency Universal
McCann, advise that for the TG 16-44 Yrs,
TV is around seven times the cost of radio.
So, by achieving three fifths of the awareness
at one seventh of the cost, the radio
campaigns were significantly more cost-efficient
than the TV campaigns. Obviously
price variance between radio and TV will
vary depending on area and audience.
This cost effectiveness advantage means
that radio has a multiplier effect when
added to a TV schedule. If 10% of a given
TV budget is re-deployed onto radio, the
efficiency of the campaign in building
awareness increases on average by 15%.
Some
radio campaigns performed much more strongly
than others - indeed the strongest outperformed
the TV average.
Radio
campaigns with higher scores were characterised
by good branding - these were campaigns
where consumers were in little doubt which
brand was being advertised. Enjoyability
was also a characteristic of the better
performing campaigns, although this could
not overcome weak brand linkage.
Branding
and enjoyability appear to be significantly
more important factors than spot length
or media laydown.
Proprietary branding devices (e.g. jingles,
theme music) were strong contributors
to the effectiveness of radio advertising,
even though they may have originally been
established on TV.
Misattribution
is an important issue. Consumers may think
they have seen a campaign on TV even when
it has only run on radio. This has important
implications for measuring the effect
of radio - most importantly, research
samples need to be split into listeners
and non-listeners.
More
Research Results
Using
the findings about the relative efficiency
of radio and TV advertising, it is possible
to quantify the "media multiplier"
effect of adding radio to a TV campaign.
It
is a long-established media planning convention
to maximise TV campaign effectiveness
by taking a portion of the TV budget and
re-deploying it in another complementary
medium (not necessarily radio). This study
allows us to gauge the true effect of
applying this favoured technique to radio.
How
the calculation works
The original TV-only campaign in the example
below had a weight of 267 ratings (or
GRPs). Given that the average TV Awareness
Index is 5, this gives a total awareness
score of 1335 (267 x 5).
The revised campaign shows what happens
when 10% of those TV ratings (27) are
taken from TV and re-deployed to radio
- because of the seven-fold price differential
in the test, this amounts to 189 radio
GRPs (27 x 7). This is multiplied by the
average radio Awareness Index, then Millward
Brown also apply a reducing factor of
0.6 to take account of the fact that radio's
total reach in the region is 60% of that
for TV. Altogether this gives a total
awareness score for radio of 340, while
the remaining 90% of the TV activity delivers
an awareness score of 1200.
Added together, the radio and TV scores
(340 and 1200) amount to a total campaign
awareness score of 1540 - 15.4% higher
than the original 1335 for the TV-only
campaign.
This
example has been worked out on the basis
of a given brand re-deploying 10% of its
TV budget to radio, and assumes the same
price differential as in the test. The effect
for different brands, and under different
conditions, will naturally vary - Millward
Brown can offer advice on this.