Top Story


Home >> Advertising >> Article

Godrej, Whirlpool settle tiff over offending ad

Font Size   16
Godrej, Whirlpool settle tiff over offending ad

The Mumbai High Court has disposed of a case filed by Godrej & Boyce Mfg Co against Whirlpool of India alleging unethical usage of one of its refrigerator models in its TV commercial, after the latter submitted a modified version of the ‘offending’ commercial and undertook not to use any of Godrej’s product or refrigerator in any of their ad campaigns.

The Court noted that since Whirlpool had ‘modified’ the commercial and withdrawn the offending one, after the two parties had entered a mutually agreed ‘settlement’, the suit ‘‘stands disposed of in accordance with the consent terms.’’

As per the consent terms, Whirlpool undertook ‘‘not to telecast the impugned TV commercial except as the modified version.’’ It also ‘‘undertook not to use any of the plaintiff’s product or refrigerator in any of their ad campaigns.’’

The commercial, created by FCB Ulka, for Whirlpool’s sixth sense technology single-door refrigerators, had shown a fridge, which, according to Godrej ‘‘had identifiers on the facade which give away the brand (as being from the Godrej stable)’’

According to Godrej vice-president (marketing and exports) Shyam Motwani, the ad had shown a Godrej refrigerator ‘‘in a denegrating manner, damaging the reputation and goodwill of the company.’’

When contacted, Whirlpool of India director legal Dinesh Mittal said,‘‘Since Godrej felt a fridge used in the ad resembled their product, we realised their anguish and, in good faith, agreed to modify the shots through computer graphics. A mutual agreement was signed between us after corrective action had been taken.’’ He however claimed that following the consent terms, Godrej had ‘withdrawn’ its case.

Godrej had initially filed a case in the Mumbai High Court in June demanding immediate withdrawal of the offending commercial, its modification and claiming Rs 50 crore in damages. ‘‘Since the ad has been modified, in a spirit of goodwill, we are not pressing for damages,’’ says Mr Motwani.

The High Court had instructed Whirlpool to modify the ad. However, the first modification did not meet with the approval of the plaintiff (GodreJ) and the court had then set a deadline of July 7 for submitting a further modified version of the commercial which met with the approval of the plaintiff.

The court, in its order of July 2, had also instructed Whirlpool not to air the original ad, till the modification was carried out. After Godrej okayed the second modification, the Court passed its order on July 7.


Karthik Raman, Chief Marketing Officer, IDBI Federal Life Insurance, on the brand’s unconventional approach to marketing and priorities for the next year

Vinik Karnik, Business Head - ESP Properties, talked about what went into conceptualising the first edition of the entertainment marketing report, Showbiz

Rahul Jhamb, Brand Head, Forever 21, on how the fast fashion brand always stays on the pulse of latest marketing trends

Heavy spends on OOH and print sum up this year’s ad spends of YLG Salon

Conceptualised and executed by WATConsult, the campaign focuses on how Lotus Make-up is an enabler for women from various walks of life

iProspect released the third annual 2018 Future Focus Whitepaper geared to examine how machines and technology will impact marketing and advertising in the year ahead

Mavcomm Consulting one of India’s leading Public Relations, Reputation Management& Brand Communications company today announced elevation of Pranjal Dutta to the role of CEO