Top Story


Home >> Advertising >> Article

2013 redux: When channels pulled out of TAM

Font Size   16
2013 redux: When channels pulled out of TAM

English News channels pulling out of the Broadcast Audience Research Council of India (BARC) is reminiscent of the 2013 standoff between TAM Media Research and the broadcasters. Multiple broadcasters had pulled out of TAM over concerns of fluctuations in ratings from LC 1 towns. Broadcasters had cast aspersions on the credibility of TAM data and even suspected corruption.  

As the events unfolded four years ago, the TV audience measurement agency had offered to shift the people meters to other cities if broadcasters insisted. It is worth recalling that in 2013, advertisers and ad agencies were in complete support of TAM and companies even threatened to withdraw advertising if broadcasters did not provide weekly ratings data for their programmes. Back then, ad agencies had stressed on an early resolution to the issue and maintained that TAM should be around until BARC came into play.

Advertisers’ Concerns

According to media report, eight advertisers, including Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL), Procter and Gamble India, Marico Ltd, Dabur India Ltd, Godrej Consumer Products Ltd, Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd and L’Oreal India Pvt. Ltd, sent letters to broadcasters, asking them to revert to the earlier weekly rating system or consider all advertising stopped within 72 hours of receiving the letter.

Exchange4media had reported in 2013 that 20 top advertisers had collectively decided not to subscribe to any alternative broadcaster-driven ratings system in case the networks decided to unsubscribe from TAM or force TAM to accede to their demands. The advertisers also decided to explore ways to create a funding model for an alternate, advertiser-driven ratings system in case the broadcasters were to take a final decision to stay out of the TAM system. Advertisers had expressed concern over TAM’s dependence on channels for its revenues and wanted to have a say in the way out of the current impasse.

They need to have objective data at least on a weekly basis to make the right decisions on advertising spends, the advertisers had stressed.

The resolution

Following the standoff, TAM had said that ratings would be shared on a monthly basis for seven major networks, which included STAR India, ZEE, MSM, Viacom18, Network18, NDTV, Times Television Network and BAG Films. In addition to monthly ratings, TAM also decided to move to the CPT (Cost Per Thousand) format for reporting the ratings. This move finally resolved the impasse between the broadcasters and TAM.


Also read:;-moves-to-cpt-format_51882.html


Markus Noder, Managing Partner, Serviceplan International, shared innovative tools, ideas and methodologies to generate tangible business values

The primary reason that led to growth of OTT is the constant improvement of internet speed and service across the country: Sandeep Gupta, ACT Fibernet

Siddharth Kumar Tewary, Founder, Chief Creative, One Life Studios and Swastik Productions, on owning the IP on his most ambitious project 'Porus,' the risk of recovering its cost and his distribution strategy

Webscale plans to build the brand around smooth operations for the e-commerce sector and then move on to demand generation

The Tata Group is considering review of its Public Relations mandate which is currently handled by PR firm Edelman in association with Rediffusion. The review is likely to happen post January 2018.

KVL Narayan Rao, Group CEO, and Executive Vice Chairman of NDTV passed away at 63 after battling cancer for two years

Week 44 (October 29-November 4, 2017) of RAM Ratings saw Big FM and Fever FM dominating Mumbai. Meanwhile Fever, Radio City and Radio Mirchi dominated Delhi, Bangalore and Kolkata respectively.